Prusa vs bambu reddit

Prusa vs bambu reddit

You can bet the support team will get you through anything. The p1p is definitely louder. Knowing Bambulab is among us since less than two years, the impact on Prusa sales must have been a big hit. We ran several minis with limited success and tossed them all at less than 500hrs, we had mk3s that we retired at 30k hrs, we haven't ran the xl. 80worf80. Bambu labs built all the hardware required for wireless into the x1 just didn’t unlock the features completely. This is not how Bambu operates. My experience with prusa is mixed. Since the Voron uses a single nozzle like the Bambu, the amount of material you need to waste during filament switches will be the same as the Bambu. Bambu has been introducing features that caught the rest of the market off guard. There's the Ender 3 V3 SE, the V3 KE, the Sovol SV06, the SV07, the A1 Mini to name but a few. 9 or MK4 and getting the Prusa Enclosure as well. The Atomic CF Nylon is the best I've used. Are you getting $1000 of value with a mk4? Do you realize that input shaping its just a compensation of the resonance frequency to prevent or significantly lower the ringing right ? Creality K1 vs Bambu Lab. Yea, I saw that post. • 3 mo. I was looking at one at microcenter and I think I prefer axing the bedslinging but I don't want to risk not being able to find anything compatible after 6 months if the company goes tits up. I’ve never had either but I’ve done some research (mostly YouTube) and would love any Pros and Cons for either! 0 comments. I complained a while ago about problems printing PETG and got the usual "dry your filament" replies. Reply. Well just an update on my Prusa mk3s+ vs Ender 3 S1. Don't have a mk4 so cant comment on print times, but my mk3 typically prints pretty close to the bambu. It was dried at 55C for >18h with a desiccant pack in the box, and I honestly wonder what the sales numbers of Prusa and Bambulab look like in the last two years. Expect Prusa will soon face an existential crisis. Also the enclosure for the prusa cost a lot extra the Bambu X1 comes with one. carbon filter. I want to buy a 3D printer and I know the two printers above are apple and oranges but for me it’s about how much to spend. 6 is close to its volumetric limits. As the title suggested, I am considering the newly released Bambu A1 mini, Prusa mini, and used Prusa i3 MK3S+. And crealitys QC is utter shit Prusa MK 4 vs Bambu A-1 Mini. To compare the x1c with the mk4 you need to add the mmu3. For what it's worth, Bambulab has said that if they go out of business or stop making printers, they will open source everything. I'd recommend you try them both and see what you like. Most filaments have a lower volumetric speed than bambu. Alright, I don't have anything against prusa, they make good printers, but here's a quick comparison. Reply reply. Plus there are already third party manufacturers making replacement parts for Bambulab printers. Also, Prusa has got Bambu beaten hands down when it comes to the services/community/support and contributions to the community. Bambu is new but they have consistently made strides to improve their support. I've never had anything but the perfect first layer on each. I would still try to find to stick with Prusa given you’re already bought into the ecosystem, the customer service of Bambu will be worse, and the long term performance of the Prusa's are designed to be workhorses. Das Budget liegt bei etwa 1500€ Im Wesentlichen habe ich die Entscheidung inzwischen auf den Mk3S+ und den X1C geworfen. Cura is shit, Bambu Studio Soft Fever best. The Bambu Labs is entirely proprietary, so it'll be rough to try to upgrade/change it. Otherwise the P1S is absolutely amazing with incredible results. Anyone else get shit for choosing Prusa over Bambu? I plan on upgrading my MK3S to an MK3. I've got 20 prints on my MK4 and over 2,500 hours on my X1Cs. The ender 3 doesn't spy on you. If you consider the ability to add a raspberry pi zero to the mk3s main board prusa “giving you options”. Bambu pro: better user experience (plug and play, smartphone app, ams etc) better price-performance ratio. I need to set aside some time and dove into tutorials and not just printing the free shit on MakerWorld. I am stuck between the Bambu Lab A1 mini with the AMS ($460) and a Creality K1 from Microcenter priced at $350. The prusa will also be a bit better to improve as the community gets its hands on it. " M5C has an flowrate of 35mm³ while A1 mini is 28mm³. Feel free to learn this the hard way. So like 2. How do I set it to do this in Prusa Slicer? The Bambu Lab X1-Carbon is a premium 3D printer that offers extremely fast print speeds, an enclosed build chamber, and automated calibration and monitoring features enabled by AI vision and Lidar sensors. I believe that Prusa and all major brands have to step up their game in terms of reliability and ease of use. These may seem different, but the amount of material Bambu P1P will get you a LOT more bang for your buck. Prusa has a solid background and have shown they can produce quality products, bambu has nothing. Interestingly, the MK4 has a significantly larger footprint despite the smaller maximum Open Source = ownership. Regardless of which brand you get a trade off. This is a crap test. If you're looking for a reliable printer and do not mind the slightly outdated (only once or twice used anyways) LCD Screen, go Prusa. Two completely different printers. Based on feedback from all of you and my curiosity in trying something new I went ahead and bought the Prusa MK3S+ ( I wish all these companies would think of friendly names for their printers like Cosmic Coffee Direct Drive II. It's just more geared toward high-speed printing and pre-set Bambu profiles. Also, it depends on what your printing. All things related to Prusa 3D printers. There are noise isolating ways to make both quieter. 9. So the AMS is definetly a advantage over the Prusa if you want multicolor printing. ADMIN MOD. They’re now up to 12 times faster than the Bambu Lab X1C: 389 x 389 x 457 mm (15. "'Monotonic lines' top/bottom fill pattern. The menus in BS are not as intuitive to me. Orca in the near future will have even more prusa features that Bambu is lacking - detection of curled edges and slow down for these plus extend infill to anchoring points plus pressure equalizer. In terms of MK4 having issues, this is a common problem with initial releases of Prusa printers. The Prusa has more heating power, so it can keep up with the demands of a bigger Hardware wise, the Bambu x1c is superior in almost every way to the mk3: There are also some novel features the prusa lacks : Of course, a new machine like the Bambu is going to have much better hardware than the five year old mk3, but prusa printers are known to have great reliability and amazing customer support. With Creality, being esentially a chinese knock-off of the Prusa, you pay less, get cheaper parts with less QA. From what I read, MK3S+ is a well-tested model. The efficiency regarding waste and time is very poor, especially when printing multicolor layers. Gambrinus2nd. The X1C is at least 3 times faster than the Ender it replaced. Both have huge parts inventory on their websites with great pricing. I was thinking getting a BambuLab printer would be the obvious choice, considering their AMS. MMU3 seems to have fixed a few of the small things with firmware communication but the design as a whole isn't Prusa's finest work. Bambu should be shipping 4,000 or more printers each month by year's end. Q&A. Group 1: Group 2: In conclusion, Group 1 (2 MK3S+) will have the most finished prints in 300 hours, with 882 successful prints. 7” x 21. For example AMS syncing, the different build plates and many material profiles included, starting prints and controlling the printer remotely, and more. A high speed, quality, reliable machine. I know Bambu has been excellent with their out of box experience, and is easy to setup and run. The pro prusa side: open source state of the art firmware. But the Prusa mini is to my ears significantly louder than a mk3s*. The biggest alternative to Prusa when saving cost I think is Creality Ender printers. It seems like based on the main criteria: Heated Bed + Auto-leveling + Multimaterial = Its either the Prusa or Ultimaker. It loves to hack digital stuff around such as radio protocols, access control systems, hardware and more. 1. Any advice would be greatly apricated, and yes I indeed have checked the Wiki. -34. AMS working and existent. However, when watching reviews I was shocked how much filament it actually wasted. Discussion. Conversely Prusa is one that seems a slower to embrace new features and they may find it harder to entice buyers to choose them over the competition. Supports might be better in Prusa Slicer, but Bambu Studio has so many Bambu-Printer-Specific features that might make your life more difficult if you didn't have them. Orca slicer is a fork of bambu slicer which is a fork of prusaslicer from what I have read. I'd go with a Prusa Mini, personally. Bambu's software makes printing super easy, but almost too easy to start. better slicer (orca does have all calibrationfunctions build in) auto calibration (flow dynamics + flow rate on X1C, flow dynamics on A1 series) Prusa pro: faster support. Slowdown for overhangs algorithm is much much better in orca vs Bambu. I will probably print both structural A used Prusa MK3, which I can get for 450 bones Or a new Bambu P1S, now 600 bones with black Friday deals. All Prusa printers have debuted with problems and then the community will fix them and Prusa will adopt those fixes a year later. Bottom is Prusa! 🤣🤪. I know that Bambu Lab is fairly new and we don't know whether they are reliable in the long term, but it's cheaper than the i3, much faster, it's already assembled and we know that reviews are in general quite good. higher quality parts. Pavers, noise isolation, enclosures, etc. PrusaSlicer vs Bambu Studio Top Layer Question. It's not radically different from MK3's. Which one of these would u buy? Any advice which one to choose? My goal with a new 3D printer, is printing for hobby, maybe sell a few parts for near friends and family. Oct 23, 2023 · I wanted to cut through the hype regarding Bambu Labs and get to some "facts", especially with the new Bambu A1 (Mini) and the Prusa Input Shaper software now being released. A single flagship mass produced product is not long term sustainable for a company. 0”) Prusa MK4: 500 x 550 x 400 mm (19. Late to the party, but: Bambu sounds fun, yes. 2. They use chopped carbon fibers rather than carbon fiber powder and it's made in the US. The speed of the Prusa XL has been demonstrated. The price is slightly more than the Bambu Lab PA-Cf (~$5) but it's well worth it IMO. No. 15 through 0. I got a bambu ps1 and altough its a killer machine, i think the AMS doesnt serve well its main purpose of multicolor prints. 4. This allows for smaller perimeter/infill overlap and results in better filling of the top/bottom layer, less over-extrusion, and better dimensional accuracy. Prusa Mk3S+ vs Bambulab X1C. The Mini is actually slightly newer technology with a 32-bit board. Prusa have been using MK4's for a long time before the product became available in order to print parts. What does Bambu do, to test the reliability of their printers? So, just think yourself. That means Bambu'rs don't need to worry about filament tips whatsoever while Prusa'rs can get super frustrated over it and myriad of related issues that can/do stem . The Voron uses a purge tower to purge the single nozzle, while the Bambu uses pellet purging followed by a prime tower to prime the nozzle. Change volumetric speed to like 14 and save as an overture profile and try it. The fact that bambu also has an app is really good and I use it a ton. But if the Prusa kit is not worth it, it seems to me like Ultimaker wins this category I think. M5C also lacks a screen and requires a phone app, but has a bigger build size at 220×220mm vs 180×180mm on the A1 mini. Nachdem ich schon länger im Besitz eines Anycubic i3 Mega bin, steht nun eine Neuanschaffung an. You get a good glass bed and clips. Prusa Mk4 vs Bambu Labs X1C. Although the Bambu will be indisputably faster, out of the box the Prusa XL may have similar print times to the Bambu due to their default nozzle being a 0. The smaller build volume is another thing I'm considering as a bane for the MK4. With my Prusa MK3S+ I started having an issue with the x-axis. I don't think any of them are perfect, but I definitely prefer Prusa Slicer or Orca over Cura by a wide margin. If you price it without that, the Bambu one is much cheaper, and would probably be my vote. I am swinging between the Bambu mini and the MK3S+. I want to get a Bambu but I just want to know why others also chose it. Prusa MK4 - Max. • 9 mo. The question with prusa vs Bambu comes down to value. Worn out bearings and scratches down the smooth rod. It should only keep getting more noticeable as BL wins over more and more consumers. 67K subscribers in the prusa3d community. (compared to an actual quiet printer like the newer ender s1 series or the prusas). Continuous production like what Prusa does is sustainable. I want to be able to do multi-color printing AND print different materials, but I don't have the budget for a p1s with the AMS. Think of suction cup on a smooth windshield vs rough. You say they're the same price, but make sure you're comparing apples to apples. You can use their branded tools but it will also work with things like Octoprint (raspberry pi based printer manager). I am new to 3d printing and have been trying to decide what to get. For petg, if there are issues you just have to slow down usually. 6 nozzle, I imagine most people won't due to the hassle. Suspect Prusa's first hit will be mass cancellations of the Prusa XL. The AMS works well and yes it produces a lot of waste but systems like dual extruders or similar cost more than double the price of the Bambu Lab. Group 1 has 9 failed prints, taking an extra 360 minutes (6 hours), while Group 2 has 18 failed prints, taking an extra 720 minutes (12 hours). Both have very active communities. Solid company with good products and support. I bought the Prusa as a kit. The concensus always points the X1c as the be t fdm printer. I’m guessing Prusa up top. You will appreciate all the features the prusa offers vs how little the crealitys provide and I love the cr10. But Bambu mini is just being released and is simply much newer. Mein Fokus liegt dabei auf hoher Präzision und der Möglichkeit mehrere Materialien zu drücken. This was part of the version 2. Prusa MK4 vs Bambu Lab X1C. Bambu is a machine that pwns you. - The Bambu textured plate very closely matches the Prusa one, and again--Matterhacker plates. There are pros and cons of each machines. Don’t ever use sport or luda modes. At Prusa speeds, the fans are really loud, but the steppers are about as loud as a Prusa. It just got input shaping too, and is amazingly fast. Worst case scenario, you could keep the A1 Mini's linear motion system and motors, replace Prusa i3 Mk3S+ vs Bambu Lab P1S Question With Black Friday/Cyber Monday going on right now, the Mk3S+ kit is selling for $649, while the P1S is selling for $599. Prusa's value is in it's open source nature and community. However, I also find the slick look, included enclosure, and ease of use for the P1S/X1C also very appealing (The MK4 requires assembly at a similar [+$100] price of the P1S, whereas both Bambu printers come pre-assembled at their base cost). In my opinion, Prusament is better but the ridiculous shipping cost renders that advantage moot. I even lowered the exhaust fan speed so it makes less noise. You should find your max volumetric speed for each brand and lower it by like 20%. The p1p is truly not bad on silent mode and still faster than the Prusa mini. Slicer might be similar from a technical standpoint but from a UI/UX standpoint bambu is miles ahead. I’m considering an X1C but I’m hesitant to move away from cura. 5. 5. If the Prusa kit was $499, I would snatch it in a second. The prusa is print and play. 3” x 15. Bambu is off to a great start but I think they have some catching up to do in that regard. You’ll find more “activity” on the Bambu Reddit and Discord than Prusa, but that’s partly because they’re new. That said, the Bambu's X1C enclosure, wireless connectivity, camera and speed are big upgrades over the Prusa. The X1-Carbon pushes the envelope of both performance and ease of use for consumer FDM 3D printers, making it a compelling choice for users Prusa mk3s+ or XL (or mini) work like a charm and it can’t get better than this in this price range. Sport and Luda will push it over what it can extrude. - My Prusa almost never had failed prints (maybe 1/20, or less). Print Speed. Prusa imho still kills bambu in support, and the mk4 is pretty nice as it stands ( minus annoying firmware issues that will be fixed sonish ) A p1p vs a mk3, p1p wins. The Bambu isn’t as moddable or serviceable, but they’ve addressed a lot of concerns by listing the carbon rods. I tried posting on the purchase advice megathread but the link in the wiki didn’t work and I don’t see it pinned. If I want to drop around $1,000 I’ll do the MK4 if I want to do a Prusa should be worried about it, and my suggestion is that if you can wait, you should get the X1 carbon. If you want to do more or need a larger size then the Prusa might win out. Build Volume: 250 x 210 x 220 mm, Printer Size: 500 x 550 x 400 mm. The biggest difference between Bambu's implementation of multi-filamenting is their cutter is in the extruder itself, near the nozzle, while Prusa's is waay back in the MMU unit. I find myself not completely understanding the settings or what people here are talking about. Prices are in USD. Also, I can't seem to get a straight answer on the speed of the XL. If one of the plastic parts wears or breaks, I can print it very easily. The 8-bit board in the MKs is pretty much maxxed out on it's capacity so doesn't leave much room for future improvement but I wouldn't be surprised if Prusa releases a 32-bit replacement board/firmware for it eventually. Prusa deserves credit for Printables. In Bambu Studio, the top layer on prints has 1 wall and prints mostly infill. So I took a relatively complex (150 x 150 x 100) technical model and sliced it for all of the mainstream models, also with layer heights of 0. As much as I like Prusa the rollout of the mk4 and XL has been a shitshow imo, especially given the reputation of the company as being very customer service oriented. That gives you a 5 filament printer and the fun and knowledge to build your printer by yourself. mhwrx24. In my opinion, it's laid out better with fewer redundancies. $209. I’m considering jumping over from a prusa but I’m concerned that I’m going to have a hard time printing recycled petg and random pla. Then, MK3 sales will start to stumble. Used MK3S+ is priced at around 450$ where I live. It's been roughly the same with the X1C - See above, with the Matterhackers sheets (made specifically for the X1C) there's no glue stick required for the vast majority of prints/materials. The Bambu X1C specializes in those filaments. Bambu is massively louder than anything Prusa. Were I to get a Prusa XL, it'd be the 5 head version. Mini's we have 10 in the room I'm working out off at the moment and they're near silent. You ask about mk4 vs x1c so you could buy a mk4 kit and the new mmu3 for less money. I'm unaffiliated with this channel, and found the results surprising. So you are saying that just with the 0. You can also change the speed from the presets in the middle of a print (though not with as fine control as a Prusa or other printer), so you can start at normal speed and change to "quiet mode" if you need it to be quieter for a period of time. That’s what prompted me to ask this question. I will spend up $1500. The petg profile is already slowed down to 10mm3/s. I'm really curious to see what happens long term and once Prusa gets The fastest 3d printer will always be two 3d printers. They're relied upon by schools and businesses because of their reliability. At the end of the day, I bought both and will likely get one more of each. Either way Bambu wins all day. The Bambu and Prusa are only the same price if you include the color changing ability of the Bambu. Though of course it's possible to switch the Bambu to a 0. The pro bambu side: bigger print volumen. To my knowledge they are still trying to send printers to their The Bambu community sometimes looks down on Prusa as being inferior because they don't offer the same bang for the buck. 7”) If you have limited desk space, the X1C will fit into a smaller space than the MK4. Prusa didn’t give me the option, I had to buy a raspberry pi and connect through serial to the printer. Which has the least amount of filament waste. Prusa has a long standing relationship in the printing community and that comes with a lot of weight. Yes, they're great first printers. • 2 yr. I didn't have to go to Prusa for replacements, they're off the shelf parts I can order. Bambu is a freaking buzzsaw. It doesn't feel brittle like other CF-filled filaments I've tried in the past. Prusa is more utilitarian and Bambu's fork is more user-friendly for their ecosystem. Don't even bother with Ankermake. K1 Max (775€) or the Bambu lab P1S (659€ with AMS) or X1C (1109€ without AMS). The $/£200-270 ish 3D printer market is getting very interesting at the moment. Let's start with a stock ender 3 pro. Not saying that Bambu doesn't do internal testing, but that's probably not the same as running new hardware in production, in a massive print farm. I wanted to see why everyone here chose Bambu over Prusa. It's getting difficult to decide the best option. 3” x 18. Start by replace it with a micro swiss direct extrusion and all metal hotend kit. Another extremely popular option is Bambu. Like you said, the Bambu doesn't benefit a ton from the bigger nozzle because even the 0. It's the same filament. With Bambu, it's a fine printer, still new but seems fairly reliable and good quality, but if you like tinkering you can't really, it isn't intended to be serviced by the user, and there are privacy concerns with your deisgns being sent to servers in China. Looking to buy a new 3D printer, cause my Ender 3 Pro stop functioning. Post was really to get peolle talking but I'm looking to upgrade from a Ender V3 KE. The slicer is the same behind the scenes so you can get in the weeds with either. I’m using an Ender 3 S1 Pro atm and I heard a lot of bad things about the bed from creality printers but mine is kind of good. But Prusa is notorious for their customer service and the fact that The answer is the Bambu, Prusa is obsolete. I think Prusa will always be a safe bet, even if you encounter some minor issues at startup, while prusa gets on top of any supply issues. But I can guarantee you already, the wear and tear AND software issues are in my eyes not worth it. It is very similar to Monotonic, except that adjacent lines are not connected. RepresentativeNo7213. Bambulab X1C: Druckvergleich in 5 Tests . At 8:34, this video shows that this multi-color print needs 600g of filament (125g for That said, the Bambu mini is very compelling compared to the Prusa Mini. If you were to print lets say an object using 5 colors same object and object size on prusa mmu3 and on the bambu printer. On the other hand, the Bambu, with its sleek design and inbuilt cover, seems like a good fit, especially as I have a small child at home and safety is a major concern. even on silent, both of my x1's are stupid loud. However, it is a bit taller than the MK4, which may be a consideration if you’re limited on vertical space. well there you go The speeds seem to be comparable as the Bambu Lab takes more time in its start up dance before it prints a little faster, while the Prusa XL should start quicker but take a bit more time in printing. So, here is a comparison of what I get when printing dry, good quality PETG with the X1C and with a Prusa. Both have a 500mm/s speed and 300C hotend. ago. Well I got Prusa machines that have sat since I bought Bambu. 4. 7” x 15. The only thing where I personally see an advantage for Bambu is the price. I want to be clear, I have nothing against Bambu Lab and I really enjoy using the P1P at A better comparison would be the x1 vs the prusa mk3 with an enclosure, since the x1 comes with an enclosure and is cheaper than the prusa mk3 with the enclosure. Source: Prusa MK4 vs. The Bambu machines have some damn impressive features and work well, but Prusa has a legacy and a massive following for good reasons. You can fix anything by yourself and use any slicer you like. While prusa's printer is the most battle tested and generally reliable (and they have the best customer support), Bambu Labs' X1 is pretty well regarded among anyone who has tried it and has some really nice features that not even Prusa has. I’ve had good experiences with the Prusa in the past, particularly with PETG, but I’ve noticed that the latest model doesn’t seem to offer much improvement. Maybe in a year, I'll understand the Bambu well enough to be able to achieve similar success rates, but I'm thinking its always going to be a little more touchy, even if I don't push the speed. 35 and also A1 Mini w/ AMS, all the way. It is not even comparable… but also depends on what you want to do with it. Bambu Lab filament isn't really all that much better quality or finish. 1 release. This achieves a great look for the top layer. I worked on the assembly for three Flipper Zero is a portable multi-tool for pentesters and geeks in a toy-like body. 3. 6 rather than a 0. A Prusa is a machine you can own. The Prusa has better everything, its quieter and much smarter. The prusa xl with its toolchanger seems superior for this task - also for multimaterial prints. Yeah, I prefer Cura as a slicer too. Smooth PEI for better adhesion, textured is made for better release of model. Build Volume: 256 × 256 × 256 mm, Printer Size: 386 × 389 × 458 mm. Group 2 (1 Bambu LAB) will have 864 successful prints. Either way they both look like shit compared to Bambu. 8 nozzle that the Prusa is faster? I think it just comes down to the Bambu having a smaller heater. Everything prusa does bambu does way better. Apr 13, 2023 · Creality, Bambu, Prusa and Anker are all pushing to speed up how quickly consumer 3D printers can create plastic models out of molten filament. Not a very fair comparison. This means the Prusa XL will likely not be a capable printer for ABS, ASA, PA Nylons, and other higher temperature engineering filaments. Bambu vs Prusa. • 27 days ago. I get that the XL has a clear advantage due to it having multiple heads. -111. That why they recommend the glue on smooth, its acting as a release layer to prevent too much adhesion. Bambu lab will be easiest to get up and go but keep in mind its size. You should make a pro/cons list and see which wins for you. P1S AMS combo. Bambu Lab X1C vs Prusa i3 MK3S+ printing PETG. All of the same options are there you just have to get used to the differences. Prusa himself has noted that speed is not a priority for the XL. 5x the price of a X1C and I'm just not sure the ROI is there. MK4 printing with input shaper (and why wouldn't you) is a bit louder than that, but also quite silent. However, there’s always the issue of what a “closed source” machine means long term. It is far slower than the Bambu. Sort by: Search Comments. A double sided pei in general is a good idea though. Vs a mk4 it is much better balance, and I think the ease of support and repair on Prusa printers really should be taken in to consideration still. com. Sure it costs a lot more but it's worth it in the long run if you are serious about it. Right now things seem fine as you can buy spare parts without issue, for a decent price. The Cr10 is for the hobbyist and the Prusa is a tool. Vastly better experience than an Ender. If you’ve seen that glossy to matte transition in a benchy, this is why. No offense meant or flame war started with this reply. faster. Compared by price, the Prusa XL also had a XL price compared to the X1C with 4 AMS Systems, but it also has Since a decade prusa printers are workhorses made to print 24/7. i had a print going on my two prusa mk3's, and a print going on my s1 pro, all in normal mode (they have a silent mode that truly makes them virtually silent, especially the prusas as they come with noctual fans and have a fanless power supply), were still more I am however really interested in Multi-Material (or rather Multi-Color) printing. If you just print PLA, then the Bambu is probably all you need. Prusa mk3s kit costs around $750. enclosure included. I’m wondering which printer is more worth it during black week to buy. And as a remark, Prusa devlivers new versions for the Firmware of the Mk3, the Mini and you can get all maintenance parts and even update the old machines with newer tech updates. And the MK4 remains quite a traditional printer. If you are more into exotic filaments, go for X1C. Also feel free to point out any other printers I should consider. Happy 3D printing. Also the XL as a bigger print volume. The XL will be able to print more things because of its size and multi color and material options. I think we're in a midst of a shift of 3d printing, going from hobbyists and enthusiast to more main stream. Bambu being a newer company with a bunch of proprietary stuff makes me nervous but overall I like the setup of the machine. I also hear a lot of people talk about prusa being the best and it's also popped up on a lot of top 10 lists. The printers feature different print volumes and physical unit sizes, shown below: Bambu P1P - Max. You can ofcourse wait another 2-3 years and tech things always improve, if time is not important for you and you love waiting more and more for 5-10% better stuff! A Bambu Lab P1P will cost me $790 shipped to the US and already assembled. Everyone I talk to about it says that I'm wasting my time and money and I should just get the P1S instead. zo mx as ob nt uk jm ij ha ts